Did VAR sink Wolves against Fulham? Everything you need to know about the latest controversy

Fulham and Wolves engaged in an exciting Premier League encounter on Monday, which the previous received 3-2 at their house venue Craven Cottage. However, the

Fulham and Wolves engaged in an exciting Premier League encounter on Monday, which the previous received 3-2 at their house venue Craven Cottage. However, the competition was marred with VAR controversy, leaving Wolves supervisor Gary O’Neil livid. The supervisor mentioned unhealthy refereeing choices had been hurting his repute and “people’s livelihoods” after the match.

Wolves supervisor Gary O’Neil talks to the referee Michael Salisbury after the match(Reuters)

William emerged because the match-winner for Fulham, as he netted two penalties, which included a stoppage time winner. Alex Iwobi had struck the primary purpose for Fulham. If we take a look at the Wolves’ camp, Matheus Cunha and Hwang Hee-chan scored a purpose every.

VAR turns into the speaking level

Iwobi took solely seven minutes to interrupt the impasse, handing Fulham an early lead. The lead was cancelled out on the halfway stage of first half, the equaliser coming from Cunha. The VAR drama triggered ten minutes into the second half after referee Michael Salisbury pointed to the penalty spot. Nelson Semedo as he went for a sort out contained in the D in opposition to Tom Cairney, following which the referee pointed on the penalty spot. TV replays, nevertheless, prompt in any other case. It appeared that the defender had obtained a contact on the ball.

After a prolonged VAR examine, the penalty was given to Fulham and was efficiently transformed by Willian.

Wolves had been additionally awarded a penalty because the match progressed, which was efficiently transformed by Hwang.

This was not the top as Salisbury as soon as once more discovered him in a VAR scenario on the dying phases of the match. Following a tussle between Joao Gomes and Harry Wilson on the dying phases, which he initially felt was not a penalty. However, upon route from the VAR officers to take a look at the pitch aspect monitor Salisbury then reversed his choice and Willian sealed the win for Fulham.

How did the coaches react

Wolves supervisor, Gary O’Neil: “I’m managing a big football club here and the difference that you’re making to my reputation, to the club’s progression up the league, to people’s livelihoods, it’s huge.

“It cannot be like this with all of the know-how and on a regular basis within the largest league on this planet that we’re getting so many improper. It cannot be okay.”

O’Neil is the latest Premier League manager to hit out at VAR, with Liverpool’s Juergen Klopp, Tottenham Hotspur’s Ange Postecoglou, Chelsea’s Mauricio Pochettino and Arsenal’s Mikel Arteta among those criticizing the system.

Fulham manager Marco Silva also questioned two of the penalty awards. “The second (Fulham) one is a transparent penalty,” he said. “The first for us and the one for them had been a bit extra comfortable. I hope (VAR) can all the time make the fitting choices as a result of it is their job.”

Where do the 2 groups stand

Fulham secured three factors for the primary time since early October, which has lifted them 10 factors away from the relegation zone. They are positioned 14 on the desk.

Wolves, alternatively, sit two factors above Fulham regardless of the loss.

Source: www.hindustantimes.com

Get Latest News, India News, World News, Todays news