In the continued Test collection between India and England, the Decision Review System (DRS) has been one of many main speaking factors. England’s Ben Stokes had expressed doubts concerning the expertise after their defeat in Rajkot final week, when he acknowledged he needed the Umpire’s Call scrapped. In Ranchi, one other DRS controversy unfolded when former captain Joe Root was given out within the second innings on Sunday.
The Hawk-Eye for Joe Root’s dismissal within the 4th Test(X)
Starting their innings with a 46-run lead, England confronted a troublesome problem towards India’s spin assault; Ravichandran Ashwin struck early, dismissing Ben Duckett and Ollie Pope on consecutive deliveries. He additional dented England’s hopes by eradicating Root, however the method of dismissal triggered vital dialogue within the cricketing circles.
Hindustan Times – your quickest supply for breaking news! Read now.
In the ultimate supply of the seventeenth over, Ashwin’s supply on the leg-stump line appeared to go previous Root’s inside edge and hit him on the entrance pad. Umpire Kumara Dharmasena was unconvinced, because the supply gave the impression to be pitching exterior the leg stump. However, Rohit Sharma and co. determined to assessment the choice.
Although UltraEdge confirmed no involvement of the bat, the ball-tracking indicated three reds, resulting in Root’s dismissal. The English camp was shocked by the choice, notably contemplating that a good portion of the ball gave the impression to be pitching exterior the leg stump, elevating doubts concerning the accuracy of the expertise.
Former England captain Michael Vaughan wasn’t too happy with the expertise and, in his column for the Telegraph, appeared to supply an answer that might add to the “integrity” of the system.
“It only takes one look at social media to see that a lot of people don’t trust it,” Vaughan wrote of Joe Root’s determination.
“There is so much anger and suspicion about decisions that go for or against certain teams. There’s suspicion about host broadcasters and who is in the truck. That is despite the technology companies not actually being from the same country as the host broadcaster. For instance, Hawk-Eye is a company from the UK but is being used in this series. They are just brought in by the host broadcaster.
“So here’s a simple solution to help improve transparency and accountability: stick a camera and microphone in the truck so as a decision is being made, we all know exactly what is going on, and how much humans are involved. And if you stick an ICC official in there as well we’d know that the integrity – something we talk so much about in the game – is intact. You could argue that those running the technology in the truck are as important as the two standing umpires,” wrote Vaughan.
The former England captain further stated that the TV cameras can switch to the DRS truck whenever a decision needs to be reviewed to ensure “transparency” in decision-making.
“Technology in different sports activities like soccer or rugby clearly isn’t excellent however that’s one thing they do higher than cricket. It’s extra accountable and clear, and we are able to watch the choice being made.
“It would be so much better for everyone – the players, the broadcasters, the technology companies, and the viewers – if there was a camera in the truck that showed us that decision being made, so we can all follow the process. The umpire makes the signal for DRS and we go straight to the truck and show us exactly how we come to the final decision,” Vaughan instructed.
Source: www.hindustantimes.com
